The better a Korean company pays, the wider its gender gap
Rank listed companies by average pay and the gender gap widens as you climb. Firms paying under 50m won a head give women 75% of men's; those over 120m give 70%. A high-paying employer comes with a steeper ladder. Not advice.
AI-assisted, human-reviewed sourcing. Figures are pulled programmatically from the official sources listed at the end of this article and checked by an editor before publication.
genderpay-gapworkforcehierarchykorea
We have measured two things about the Korean gender pay gap already: that it sits near 73% market-wide, and that hiring more women does not close it. Here is a third, and it is the most counterintuitive of the set. The gap is not worst at the struggling, low-wage end of the market. It is worst at the top.
The ladder steepens as pay rises
Sort the 2,530 listed companies with 30 or more staff by their average pay per head, and read the median gender ratio in each band:
- Under 50m won a head: 75.0%
- 50–70m: 74.4%
- 70–90m: 72.3%
- 90–120m: 70.2%
- Over 120m: 69.7%
Every step down the ratio lines up with a step up in pay. The best-paying employers — the ones a worker most wants to join — are precisely the ones where the average woman falls furthest behind the average man. From the lowest pay band to the highest the gap widens by about five points, and it does so without a single reversal.
Why the good jobs have the wide gaps
The mechanism is the same one that runs underneath every version of this number: the gap is about which rungs people stand on, and high-paying firms have taller ladders. A company that pays a head-office average of 120m won is usually one with a deep hierarchy of senior engineers, executives and specialists — roles that are disproportionately held by men, and that pull the male average sharply upward. A firm paying 45m has a flatter structure with less room at the top for the averages to separate. So the very thing that makes an employer attractive — a long, well-paid career ladder — is the thing that makes its average gender gap wide. Finance and heavy manufacturing, the market’s best payers, are also where the ratio is lowest.
What this is, and what it is not
This is a description of averages, not of pay for equal work, and it is not investment advice — a wide gap here is not a mark against a company any more than a narrow one is a mark for it. It is also not independent of company size: higher-paying firms tend to be larger, so this cut and a size-based one lean the same way rather than confirming each other twice. What the data shows, cleanly and without exception across the pay bands, is a pattern worth holding onto: in Korea the gender pay gap is not a low-wage problem that money would fix. The higher a company’s pay, the further its women sit from its men — because the gap lives in the shape of the ladder, and the best-paying ladders are the steepest.
Data & Verification Notes
- Data as of
- Sources
- SeoulMarkets company-filings dataset — Average pay overall and by gender as filed to DART (FY2025 basis), companies with 30+ employees, joined to KRX listings on ticker
- Cross-checks
- Across 2,530 listed companies with 30+ employees, the median female-to-male pay ratio falls as average pay rises: 75.0% at firms paying under 50m won a head, 74.4% at 50-70m, 72.3% at 70-90m, 70.2% at 90-120m and 69.7% above 120m
- The step is monotonic — every pay band has a lower median ratio than the one below it — and spans about five points from the lowest-paying firms to the highest
- Excluded figures
- Any claim of unequal pay for the same work — the ratio is an average-pay gap that reflects role and seniority mix, which higher-paying firms tend to have more of
- Companies under 30 employees and firms disclosing only one of the two figures
- The overlap with company size — higher-paying firms are often larger, so this cut and a size cut point the same way and are not independent
The full dataset behind these figures — every listed company, every row — is available to license. SeoulMarkets data for licence →
Not investment advice. SMarkets publishes data journalism for general information only. Nothing here is investment advice, a recommendation, or an offer to buy or sell any security — any investment you make is at your own risk and responsibility. Figures are derived from official public data sources and may be revised by the issuing agency. Verify independently before acting.
← More Equities