Macro

Korean men now carry 14% more mortgage debt than women — in 2013 the gap was 1%

Bank of Korea borrower-level data: mortgage balance per borrower was ₩91.6m for men and ₩90.4m for women in 2013. By 2026Q2 it is ₩170.2m against ₩149.3m — a gap that widened in 47 of 53 quarters.

AI-assisted, human-reviewed sourcing. Figures are pulled programmatically from the official sources listed at the end of this article and checked by an editor before publication.

korea household debtkorea mortgagemortgage per borrowerkorea housing loanbank of koreakorea household creditkorea economyhousehold debt by gender

Korea’s household debt is counted and recounted — ₩2019.8 trillion of household credit as of 2026Q2, up from ₩464.7 trillion in 2002. What almost nobody counts in English is who is carrying it. The Bank of Korea publishes one split that answers part of that question, and in thirteen years it has moved a long way.

The number

Mortgage balance per borrower, 2026Q2:

Per borrower
Men ₩170.2m
Women ₩149.3m
All borrowers ₩161.9m
Gap ₩20.9m — men ahead by 14.0%

The same table thirteen years earlier, 2013Q1:

Per borrower
Men ₩91.6m
Women ₩90.4m
Gap ₩1.2m — men ahead by 1.3%

In 2013 a male and a female mortgage borrower in Korea owed within about a million won of each other. Today the difference is roughly what a small new car costs.

It did not jump — it crept

The gap is not the product of one policy or one year. It is a slope.

Quarter Men Women Men ahead by
2013Q1 ₩91.6m ₩90.4m 1.3%
2016Q1 ₩107.5m ₩104.0m 3.4%
2019Q1 ₩120.7m ₩115.1m 4.8%
2022Q1 ₩134.3m ₩123.5m 8.8%
2025Q1 ₩158.8m ₩141.0m 12.6%
2026Q2 ₩170.2m ₩149.3m 14.0%

Across the 53 quarterly steps in the series the ratio rose in 47 and fell in 6 — and the six falls were tiny, the largest barely a thousandth. There is no quarter where the trend breaks. Both sides grew; men’s balances simply grew faster, plus 85.8% against plus 65.1%, with the all-borrower average up 77.7%.

What this does not say

This is the part that coverage of a number like this usually skips, so we are putting it before the interpretation rather than after it.

  • It is per borrower, not per household. A married couple with a single mortgage in one name appears once, on that one side of the table. That alone can move a sex split without anyone’s housing changing.
  • It says nothing about who owns the home, who pays the instalment, or who lives there. A loan balance is a loan balance.
  • It is a stock, not a flow. Someone who borrowed in 2015 and has not moved since is still in this average every quarter.
  • The Bank of Korea does not publish, in this table, how many borrowers are on each side. So we cannot tell you whether the gap comes from men taking larger loans or from the mix of who borrows at all having changed. We looked for that split, it is not there, and we are not going to guess at it.

A reader who wants one sentence from this should take the narrow one: the average Korean mortgage held by a man has grown faster than the average mortgage held by a woman, in all but six quarters out of fifty-three. Why that is true is a separate question, and this table does not answer it.

For context, the rest of the tape

Household credit, the broadest official measure, stands at ₩2019.8 trillion in 2026Q2. Bank loan delinquency of one month or more sits at 0.4% on household loans in July 2026, against 0.8% on corporate loans and 1.9% on credit-card loans. By that measure the stress in Korean credit right now is not in mortgages.

For who actually holds Korea’s household debt — and why the bank-versus-non-bank split has moved less than most coverage assumes — see Korea’s household debt quadrupled in 24 years, and who holds it barely changed. For the repayment side, see Korea’s credit stress is in companies, not households.

Figures are from the Bank of Korea’s ECOS statistical service, tables 181Y012, 151Y001 and 901Y124, retrieved 2026-10-04. The per-borrower series is published in units of ₩100,000; we converted to millions of won and show one decimal. Not investment advice.

Data & Verification Notes

Data as of
Sources
  • Bank of Korea (ECOS) — Table 181Y012, mortgage balance per borrower, quarterly, items 0000 all / B001 men / B002 women, 2013Q1 to 2026Q2, unit KRW 100,000; retrieved 2026-10-04
  • Bank of Korea (ECOS) — Table 151Y001, household credit by lender, quarterly 2002Q4 to 2026Q2, unit KRW bn; used only for the total-stock context figure
  • Bank of Korea (ECOS) — Table 901Y124, bank loan delinquency of one month or more, monthly to 2026-07, unit percent; used only for the context paragraph
Cross-checks
  • 2013Q1: men KRW 91.6m, women KRW 90.4m per borrower, men ahead by 1.3 percent
  • 2026Q2: men KRW 170.2m, women KRW 149.3m, men ahead by 14.0 percent, a gap of KRW 20.9m
  • Across the 53 quarterly steps from 2013Q1 to 2026Q2 the men-to-women ratio rose in 47 and fell in 6 (2016Q2, 2016Q4, 2017Q1, 2017Q3, 2018Q4, 2026Q2)
  • Growth 2013Q1 to 2026Q2: men plus 85.8 percent, women plus 65.1 percent, all borrowers plus 77.7 percent
  • All-borrower average 2026Q2: KRW 161.9m
Excluded figures
  • This is the average mortgage balance per borrower, not per household and not per home. A couple with one loan appears once, under whoever holds the loan
  • It says nothing about who owns the property, who pays the instalment, or who the home is for
  • It is a stock of debt, not a flow of purchases. A borrower who took a loan in 2015 and never moved still counts every quarter
  • ECOS does not publish the borrower counts behind these averages in this table, so we cannot say whether the gap comes from larger loans or from a changing mix of borrowers. We did not measure that
  • No income, age or region split exists in table 181Y012. We looked
  • ECOS table 181Y015 splits new mortgage lending into entry, top-up and switch. We checked the raw item names and they do not mean first-time homebuyer, so we left that series out rather than describe it wrongly
  • This is not investment advice and not housing advice

The full dataset behind these figures — every listed company, every row — is available to license. SeoulMarkets data for licence →

Not investment advice. SMarkets publishes data journalism for general information only. Nothing here is investment advice, a recommendation, or an offer to buy or sell any security — any investment you make is at your own risk and responsibility. Figures are derived from official public data sources and may be revised by the issuing agency. Verify independently before acting.

← More Macro
SMarkets dataLicense the Korea Concentration Indexhow top-heavy Korea’s market and trade are — Samsung’s KOSPI weight, top partners, updated daily